Nature cannot afford frivolous jeux desprits.
Darwinian selection sets up childhood brains with a tendency to believe their elders. It sets up brains with a tendency to imitate, hence indirectly to spread rumors, spread urban legends, and believe religions. But given that genetic selection has set up brains of this kind, they then provide the equivalent of a new kind of nongenetic heredity, which might form the basis for a new kind of epidemiology, and perhaps even a new kind of nongenetic Darwinian selection. I believe that religion is one of a group of phenomena explained by this kind of nongenetic epidemiology, with the possible admixture of nongenetic Darwinian selection. If I am right, religion has no survival value for individual human beings, nor for the benefit of their genes. The benefit, if there is any, is to religion itself.
Richard Dawkins, What use is Religion in Free Inquiry Magazin Vol. 24/5.
Richard Dawkins, What use is Religion in Free Inquiry Magazin Vol. 24/5.
zeitgenossen - 8. Sep, 15:28
Alles
Mein Kurzzeitgedächtnis