Ideen.
The liberal, the socialist, and the anarchist seem all
to accept three principles: that the individual should
be so educated and so placed in society that he can
form for himself ambitions and ideals whose pursuit
is satisfying to him; that the worth of his ambitions
and ideals depends partly on their pursuit being useful
to society, partly on the satisfaction he gets from pur-
suing them, and partly on their pursuit bringing into
play abilities that are admirable; and that the individ-
ual should accept willingly rules of conduct that he
can defend on rational grounds and can act upon firmly
and intelligently. These three principles, though so-
cialists and anarchists (not to speak of many con-
servatives) accept them, are nevertheless properly
called liberal. They are more closely and obviously
connected with freedom than with the social control
of production or the abolition of government or the
preservation of established institutions; and the writers
who have done most to explain and recommend
them—as, for example, Humboldt, Mill, and T. H.
Green—are widely acknowledged to be liberals.
Quelle: Dictionary of the History of Ideas
to accept three principles: that the individual should
be so educated and so placed in society that he can
form for himself ambitions and ideals whose pursuit
is satisfying to him; that the worth of his ambitions
and ideals depends partly on their pursuit being useful
to society, partly on the satisfaction he gets from pur-
suing them, and partly on their pursuit bringing into
play abilities that are admirable; and that the individ-
ual should accept willingly rules of conduct that he
can defend on rational grounds and can act upon firmly
and intelligently. These three principles, though so-
cialists and anarchists (not to speak of many con-
servatives) accept them, are nevertheless properly
called liberal. They are more closely and obviously
connected with freedom than with the social control
of production or the abolition of government or the
preservation of established institutions; and the writers
who have done most to explain and recommend
them—as, for example, Humboldt, Mill, and T. H.
Green—are widely acknowledged to be liberals.
Quelle: Dictionary of the History of Ideas
zeitgenossen - 1. Nov, 13:32
Re: Ideen
>>that he can form for himself ambitions and ideals whose pursuit
>>is satisfying to him
Hier hab ich wohl eher libertäre als liberale Ansichten. Meiner Meinung sollte es zB kein (positives) Recht auf ein freies/hochsubventionierertes Studium geben. Ähnliches gilt für Mittelschulen, aber hier wäre der Übergang (zum "neuen System") wesentlich komplizierter.
>>that the worth of his ambitions and ideals depends partly on their
>>pursuit being useful to society, partly on the satisfaction he gets
>>from pursuing them, and partly on their pursuit bringing into
>>play abilities that are admirable;
Ja, sehr schön, aber irgendwie doch nur Worthülsen.
>>and that the individual should accept willingly rules of conduct
>>that he can defend on rational grounds and can act upon firmly
>>and intelligently.
Setzen wir uns alle auf dem "rationalen Boden" im Kreis hin, machen ein Lagerfeuer und grillen Würstel. Wär doch was, oder?
wie cool,
Wir
Der eine
You've got to be
Ein
ad "protect myself": Was für eine nette Vorstellung. Das Einzige, was dir am Ende bleibt, ist das Stockholmsyndrom.
deine 72 stunden
der witz mit den adlern ist so schlecht, jetzt gibs halt zu, du hast ihn auch erst kapiert, nachdem du die lösung ergooglet hast.
außerdem glaube ich nicht an das stockholm-syndrom. ich glaube nur an amoklaufen.
Eigentlich wolltest
Ich vergröhl,
Liest
Bussi, ganz lieb.
Oh ich könnt Dich,
warum mußtest du auf dem bindestrich rumreiten? weil ich bei dir mal "repetetiv" gesagt habe, obwohl man es "repetitiv" schreibt? nur ein tippfehler, aber dann war ich zu faul, das zu ändern. nicht zu blöd, nein, nur zu faul. mal davon abgesehen, daß es ein blödes wort ist.
Du